So...the satellite is not in orbit...but the rocket worked...

It seems that the North Koreans have failed to put the satellite, Kwangmyhongsong 2, into orbit yesterday. North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the US Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) officials said in a statement that North Korea launched a Taepodong 2 missile was launched at 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, April 04 (11:30 a.m. on Sunday, April 05 Korea Standard Time), but no object entered orbit (contradicting the North Korean claim that the satellite entered orbit at 11:29:02 a.m. on Sunday). The statement said, “Stage one of the missile fell into the Sea of Japan (East Sea). The remaining stages along with the payload itself landed in the Pacific Ocean. No object entered orbit and no debris fell on Japan…NORAD and USNORTHCOM assessed the space launch vehicle as not a threat to North America or Hawaii and took no action in response to this launch.”

Whether the North’s satellite was successfully deployed or not, one thing is for sure – North Korea now knows that it has the technology to build a working long-range ballistic missile, which should elevate the North’s worth among countries such Iran, Syria, and the like. Oh, just in case you were wondering, Iran officially denies it had any involvement with North Korea on the development of the said missile technology – who would have thunk it.

And on an interesting note, North Korea’s official Korea Central News Agency (KCNA) announced on Monday, April 6, that Kim Jong-il visited the satellite command center Sunday to observe the launch of the North Korean rocket, and celebrated the successful orbiting of a communications satellite. KCNA said, Kim Jong-il, accompanied by Secretary Jon Pyong Ho and First Vice-Department Director Ju Kyu-chang of the central committee of the North Korea's ruling Workers Party, expressed great satisfaction over the scientists and technicians who "successfully launched the satellite with their own wisdom and technology." It said that Kim also stressed "the need to bring about a new turn in conquering outer space and making peaceful use of it."

Along with its announcement, KCNA also released a photo of Kim Jong-il, which was supposedly taken at the General Satellite Command and Control Center on April 5, where Kim watched the rocket launch from beginning to the end.

North Korea’s Missile Launch: The Risks of Overreaction

In the latest International Crisis Group's (ICG) Asia Briefing, published 31 Mar, the report states that a tough response to North Korea’s rocket launch would likely result in the demise of the talks to end its nuclear program and could risk a potentially devastating war, damaging to South Korea, Japan and the world economy.

North Korea’s Missile Launch: The Risks of Overreaction, the latest report from the International Crisis Group, examines North Korea’s provocation and the way it leaves Japan, South Korea and the U.S. few good options. The prospective launch fits a pattern of North Korean attention-seeking when faced with stresses at home, political changes abroad or failure to get what it wants in negotiations.

“Even if the missile launch test is successful, it would only slightly increase security risks, while an overblown response would likely jeopardise the Six-Party Talks to end North Korea’s nuclear program”, says Gareth Evans, Crisis Group’s President. “What is needed is a calm, coordinated response from the key actors to raise pressure on Pyongyang to return to the talks rather than a divided reaction that only fulfils the North’s desire to widen splits among its neighbors.”

Security Council Resolution 1695 demands that North Korea not launch any missile, but Pyongyang argues – with support from some Security Council members – that this does not extend to a satellite rocket launch permitted under the Outer Space Treaty, and the legal issues are inconclusive.

An overreaction to the test that prompts the North to abandon the Six-Party Talks would strengthen hardliners in Pyongyang. The other five members of the Six-Party Talks should agree to a moderate set of measures that maintains their unity in the face of North Korea’s provocation. They could do this by issuing a joint statement condemning the launch as provocative in the current tense climate, reaffirming Security Council Resolutions 1695 and 1718, and demanding that North Korea return to the Six-Party Talks.

South Korea, the United States and Japan should agree on an overall package deal in exchange for major steps forward in nuclear and missile disarmament. Such a deal should be presented by a high-level U.S. envoy sent to meet Kim Jong-Il in Pyongyang, and then be endorsed in the six-party process.

“If the launch does take place, the best outcome for the international community is simply for it to fail, as an earlier test did”, says Daniel Pinkston, Crisis Group’s North East Asia Deputy Project Director. “If the rocket is shot down by either Japan or the U.S., the North Koreans would see this as a sign of Tokyo and Washington’s implacable hostility and almost certainly withdraw from the Six-Party Talks.”

If you are asking if I agree with the ICG's assessment of the situation, I would have to say that I do. No matter how you slice it, there just aren't that many good outcomes coming out of this launch.